Ediarum: Arbeits- und Publikationsumgebung für digitale Editionen
Am 21.08. werden uns Nadine Arndt und Jan Wierzoch Ediarum vorstellen – das vielseitige und erweiterbare Tool zum Erstellen Digitaler Editionen. Anmeldemodalitäten finden sich hier
Am 16.10.2025 wird Jennifer Bunselmeier (Universität Wuppertal) im Rahmen unserer Vortragsreihe InFoDiText+ vortragen. Unter dem Titel “XSLT als Alleskönner in digitalen Editionen: PDF, SVG, E-Book & mehr aus XML generieren” wird sie die vielseitige Rolle...
Am 21.08. werden uns Nadine Arndt und Jan Wierzoch Ediarum vorstellen – das vielseitige und erweiterbare Tool zum Erstellen Digitaler Editionen. Anmeldemodalitäten finden sich hier
When the blog post „Taste the Data” by Jim Casey (CDH Princeton) was nominated for republishing at Open Methods, my reaction was a little bit divided. On the one hand the nomination had my full support, but...
Classics / Essays / Interdisciplinarity / Philology / Theory
by Christopher Nunn · Published 2019-11-08
By accident, I started a Twitter-controversy about the necessity and existence of theory in Digital Humanities. On the way to my office early in the morning, I interpreted a quote of Franco Moretti as...
Essays / Interdisciplinarity / Research Infrastructure / Theory
by Stefan Karcher · Published 2019-07-31
In response to Andreas W. Müller and Frederik Elwert I was asked to share my idea of the future of Digital Humanities. First of all, whenever humanists, journalists, philosophers, industry or the media experts...
Classics / Computer Linguistics / Essays / History / Interdisciplinarity / Methods / Philology / Theology
by Christopher Nunn · Published 2019-05-09
In my last blogpost, I mentioned a frequent resentment of humanists towards DH, namely the opinion that data-driven results are simply meaningless correlations. Where does this attitude come from? Maybe we could find a...
The other day, I started a poll on Twitter and asked the community the following question: Are the Digital Humanities an academic discipline or a collection of methods? Are they both or neither? The...
Some years ago, I visited the “Bibelhaus,“ a museum about the culture and environment of the Bible, in Frankfurt and took part in a guided tour. The guide showed us a ball of papyrus...
Computer Linguistics / Interdisciplinarity / Methods / Research Infrastructure
by Stefan Karcher · Published 2019-02-18
Back in my school days, I was not very good at learning new languages, but I had one goal: No matter what country I am in, I will not starve, because I will be...
Junior researchers who analyse their sources with digital approaches can profit from productive environments where the advantages and potentials of these techniques are well known and established. In Germany, for example, this is the case if they are in the lucky position to work in one of the (fortunately increasing number of) digital humanities institutions in Berlin, Cologne, Darmstadt, Hamburg, Jena, Leipzig, Mainz, Munich, Potsdam, or Trier. I’m pretty sure the list is even longer, but if they don’t work nearby DH institutions, they are often faced with prejudices against their practices. In this post, I want to list five statements revealing biased attitudes, which I constantly hear, and propose answers to refute them.
Interdisciplinarity / Research Infrastructure
by Stefan Karcher · Published 2018-10-05 · Last modified 2018-12-06
Vacation time is over and – which is a bit surprising for PhD students – I had much time to think about my dissertation and my academic future. I did some researches and picked up many new interesting fields someone should deal with. However, from time to time, I got angry about an issue which came across a lot. Have you ever noticed how stupid some subject-related databases are? I mean, having them helped us find sources and texts, which enriched our own work, was a wonderful opportunity 10 years ago; but today, 10 years later the relation between the whole bunch of data sets became the focus of some researchers’ attention.
Computer Linguistics / Methods / Research Infrastructure / Tools
by Christopher Nunn · Published 2018-08-03 · Last modified 2018-12-06
„One can’t go wrong with this,“ I thought. Well – now I know better!
In an academic exercise, I presented some digital methods to teacher trainees. I wanted to enable them to use these methods deliberately later in school. The required tools were as simple as possible. It was important that they were quick to apply (as teacher’s time is very limited) and easy to use (so their pupils could work with them as well – without losing attention on the content of the lesson). Hereby, the content, not the technology, must be emphasized.
Methods / Philology / Theology / Tools
by Stefan Karcher · Published 2018-07-20 · Last modified 2018-12-06
When I started my dissertation project a few years ago, I was looking for proper tools to transcribe handwritings like this:
Research about late antique women is often very difficult due to a glaring lack of sources. Letters addressed to women are rare, writings of women even rarer. The correspondence of the bishop of Hippo Regius, Augustine, written between 386 and 430 AD, is no exception. Despite 252 letters written by himself, only 17 are directed to all-female correspondents. Their responses are not extant.
Computer Linguistics / Methods / Philology / Theory
by Stefan Karcher · Published 2018-05-28 · Last modified 2022-08-25
Humanities tend to make things complicated. And that’s a privilege, because they have decided to describe and analyze their topic of research as exactly as possible. Skimming over complex issues leads to a loss of important details and, in doing so, to inaccurate argumentations. As humanists, our medium to transport insights and information is still a language and so – besides scientific research – we artfully string together words and produce rhetorical highly adorned sentences to convince our readers that our assumptions and arguments are unassailable. To describe details, we often need a lot of words (although sometimes we reduce a complex issue to a familiar technical term)!
“Digital church” (#DigitaleKirche) is currently much discussed. It’s inspiring (and sometimes amusing) to follow the debates about digital tools, social media, helpful apps, or the latest means of communication in all fields of ecclesiastical life. Thinking about “blessing robots,” “donation apps,” or “pastoring chat bots” is an important step to usher the church into the daily digital experience of their (potential) members. I think the church has to go that way for communicational and administrative reasons as long as digital technology supports pastoral tasks and doesn’t replace “offline” community. In this way, #DigitaleKirche is an esteem of the communicative fundamental structure of the church and, also, of the ways communication between people has changed.
(auch auf Deutsch!)
The Interdisciplinary Forum of Digital Textual Sciences (part of T+ext+) at the University and State Library Darmstadt is an open meeting for (junior) researchers in all fields of Digital Humanities. It was founded by doctoral students of the University of Heidelberg who meet every month during the semester turn for an informal exchange about theories and methods of digital text analysis and their own projects. On our blog we will share some impulses of the discussions at InFoDiTexT+.
Please enter the debate with your comments or share your work as a guest author on our blog - or at InFoDiTexT+.
Contact: @InFoDiTex (Twitter) or @InFoDiTex@fedihum.org
Special thanks to Kim Phan for proofreading and editing.
